Wednesday, May 30, 2007

History's Greatest Monster
The fact is that Jimmy Carter could not have done more to damage our national security had he been a hand-picked mole planted in the White House by the KGB.
Investor's Business Daily has a 10-part series on why Jimmy Carter is the worst President in history (I prefer the Simpson's description of him as "history's greatest monster').
When Carter left office, the Soviet Union was on the march from Grenada to Afghanistan, control of the strategic Panama Canal had been given away, our military had planes that couldn't fly and ships that couldn't sail for lack of trained crews and spare parts, production of the B-1 strategic bomber had been canceled and our economy was in no shape to resist Soviet expansion.
Carter wasn't happy to just ruin our military and diplomatic standing throughout the world - Carter also seemed to want to destroy our economy also:
Here's where things stood in 1980, Carter's last year in office, and in subsequent periods:

• Carter: Interest rate, 21%. Inflation, 13.5%. Unemployment, 7%. The so-called "Misery Index," which Carter used to great effect in his 1976 campaign to win election, 20.5%.

• Reagan's last year: Interest rate, 9%. Inflation, 4.1%. Unemployment, 5.5%. Misery Index, 9.6%.

• Bush today: Interest rate, 8%. Inflation, 2.6%. Unemployment, 4.5%. Misery Index, 7.1%.
History will view the taking of the US Embassy in Iran as the signature event in Carter's Presidency and that's worth a closer look:
When Carter got around to hinting about the use of military force, Khomeini offered this mocking response: "He is beating on an empty drum. Neither does Carter have the guts for military action nor would anyone listen to him."

Carter did actually try a military response of sorts. But like every other major policy action of his, he bungled it. The incompetence of his administration would be seen in the wreckage in the Iranian desert, where a plan to rescue the hostages resulted in the loss of eight aircraft, five airmen and three Marines.

Among the core group of hostage takers and planners of the attack on our embassy was 23-year-old Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who learned firsthand the weakness and incompetence of Carter's foreign policy, one that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid are now attempting to resurrect.
That last quote is worth letting sinking in. It is sometimes worth asking "What would Harry Truman or Ronald Reagan do?" And it is useful to contrast that with the question, "What would Jimmy Carter do?" If a politician's actions fall more into line with Carter than Truman or Reagan - then its time to vote that politician out of office.

No comments:

Post a Comment